The Invisible Role of AI

AI Did Not Create the Problem — It Scaled It!
Artificial Intelligence did not invent humanity’s worst incentives.

What AI did is far more dangerous.
It made them frictionless, automated, and planetary in scale.

AI systems today are not neutral observers. They are optimization engines, relentlessly executing objectives defined by business models, economic pressures, and legacy thinking.

To understand the real risk, we must examine how AI amplifies each harmful formula already shaping society.

1. Engagement = Attention × Emotion × Time
How AI Contributes

AI is the engine behind engagement optimization.

What AI actually does here:
• Trains on billions of interactions to predict what keeps users hooked
• Learns emotional triggers faster than any human editor
• Continuously A/B tests content impact in real time
• Personalizes outrage, fear, or affirmation per individual

AI does not ask whether content is true, healthy, or constructive — unless explicitly instructed to.

Result at scale:
• Emotional manipulation becomes automated
• Radicalization becomes optimized
• Misinformation becomes adaptive

This is why two people can see entirely different realities on the same platform.

Relevant sources:
https://www.humanetech.com
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ade9097

2. Productivity = Output ÷ Time
How AI Contributes

AI accelerates productivity metrics — but often at the cost of human cognition.

What AI enables:
• Constant performance monitoring
• Automated task compression
• Expectation of instant response and delivery
• Removal of natural work pauses

AI tools promise efficiency, but efficiency without recovery leads to systemic burnout.

Hidden issue:
AI increases the pace of work faster than humans can adapt biologically.

Result at scale:
• Workers compete with machine-speed expectations
• Creative work becomes transactional
• Burnout is mislabeled as personal failure

Relevant sources:
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/05/ai-productivity-burnout
https://hbr.org/2023/07/how-ai-is-changing-knowledge-work

3. Growth = More Users × More Consumption
How AI Contributes

AI is the ultimate growth multiplier.

What AI optimizes:
• Hyper-targeted advertising
• Predictive consumption patterns
• Personalized persuasion at scale
• Dynamic pricing and demand shaping

AI does not merely respond to demand — it creates it.

Critical problem:
AI systems are rewarded for increasing consumption, not sustainability.

Result at scale:
• Overproduction and waste
• Psychological pressure to consume
• Environmental strain amplified by precision marketing

Relevant sources:
https://www.unep.org/resources/report/consumption-and-production
https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights

4. Worth = Visibility × Validation
How AI Contributes

AI now mediates social value.

What AI decides daily:
• Who gets seen
• Who gets buried
• Which voices scale
• Which ideas disappear

AI ranking systems convert human expression into performance metrics.

What breaks:
• Quiet expertise
• Long-term thinking
• Non-performative contribution

AI learns from past engagement — reinforcing existing biases and popularity loops.

Result at scale:
• Attention inequality
• Performative identity
• Mental health decline

Relevant sources:
https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/03/cover-social-media
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-022-01335-5

5. Power = Control of Infrastructure, Not Truth
How AI Contributes

AI centralizes power through infrastructure dominance.

Who controls AI today:
• Those with compute
• Those with data
• Those with deployment pipelines

Truth becomes secondary to distribution authority.

AI systems shape:
• Information visibility
• Economic opportunity
• Cultural narratives

Result at scale:
• Digital feudalism
• Reduced public agency
• Asymmetry between citizens and platforms

Relevant sources:
https://www.oecd.org/digital/ai
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/ai-governance


The Meta-Formula AI Accelerates

Optimization × Automation × Scale = Irreversible Impact

AI executes objectives faster than ethics, regulation, or social adaptation can respond.

This is not an AI alignment issue alone.
It is a human incentive alignment failure.

What Ethical AI Optimization Actually Requires

Fixing this does not mean stopping AI.

It means redefining objectives.

Human-first AI principles in practice:
• Optimize for long-term well-being, not short-term metrics
• Penalize emotional volatility in ranking models
• Introduce algorithmic friction deliberately
• Mandate transparency for high-impact systems
• Treat AI as public-interest infrastructure, not just IP

Examples already emerging:
https://www.europa.eu/ai-act
https://www.partnershiponai.org

The Sentence We Should Be Reporting Everywhere

AI is not dangerous because it is intelligent — it is dangerous because it perfectly executes flawed human goals.

Every AI system answers one question relentlessly:

“What should I optimize for?”

The future depends entirely on whether humans choose wisdom over convenience.


Comments